Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bio-tillage enhanced subsoil (40-60 cm) hydraulic conductivity and root length density compared with no-tillage.

A claim from Evaluating the contributions of mechanical- and bio-tillage to drought resistance in soil-crop system via energy dissipation in root water uptake · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-tillage enhanced subsoil (40-60 cm) hydraulic conductivity and root length density compared with no-tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
BTe6
Outcome
subsoil (40 − 60 cm) K and RLDe7
Direction
enhancede7
Comparator
CKe6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing maize drought resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–485
e6

“Compared to CK, BT not only reduced topsoil (0–20 cm) D rwu by 33.3–80.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1516
e7

“but also enhanced subsoil (40 − 60 cm) K and RLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1566

Title

Evaluating the contributions of mechanical- and bio-tillage to drought resistance in soil-crop system via energy dissipation in root water uptake

Jinqiang Wang; Zhuangzhuang Liu; Zhengchao Tian; et al. Geoderma 2026. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117847

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-c6edcd7c4a2c2a66b1ba9f961a2f53bd7eb46033dd6e0edd9e01098999dc5158 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

transgenic · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.