Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc application gave significantly higher total zinc uptake in long-duration wheat cultivars than soil application alone, at 960 g/ha.

A claim from Cotton Crop in Changing Climate · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc application gave significantly higher total zinc uptake in long-duration wheat cultivars than soil application alone, at 960 g/ha.

Material
longe0
Treatment
soil + foliar application of Zne0
Outcome
Total Zn uptake by wheat (grain + straw)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
960 g/hae0
Comparator
soil applicatione0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total Zn uptake by wheat (grain + straw) cultivars with soil + foliar application of Zn was significantly higher in short (933 g/ha) and long (960 g/ha) duration cultivars compared to that with soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–695

Title

Cotton Crop in Changing Climate

A. Shikha; P. Maharana; K. K. Singh; et al. Current Science 2018. doi:10.18520/cs/v115/i5/948-954

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c7eed404d036335575e6dd99e0bd76515749697d65f5c3d46e8a5c40b1e69630 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.