Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a more robust antioxidant system than shade (T2) plants.

A claim from Why is it better to produce coffee seedlings in full sunlight than in the shade? A morphophysiological approach · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a more robust antioxidant system than shade (T2) plants.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
antioxidant systeme1
Direction
more robuste1
Comparator
T2 plantse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426
e1

“which were shown to have a more robust antioxidant system than the T2 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1107

Title

Why is it better to produce coffee seedlings in full sunlight than in the shade? A morphophysiological approach

G. A. B. K. Moraes; A. R. M. Chaves; S. C. V. Martins; et al. Photosynthetica 2010. doi:10.1007/s11099-010-0025-4

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-cb2a6a1cc9bcd3c89543b9816da825cdff71dab102bd268e683c01528305b194 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

light · molecular: metabolites · Coffea arabica (arabica coffee)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.