Paper · 2010 · Photosynthetica

Why is it better to produce coffee seedlings in full sunlight than in the shade? A morphophysiological approach

G. A. B. K. Moraes; A. R. M. Chaves; S. C. V. Martins; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The coffee plant is native to shaded environments and its seedlings are often produced in shaded nurseries. However, some nursery managers, in an effort to improve the acclimation of seedlings to field conditions after transplantation, produce seedlings in full sun exposure. In this study, the morphological and physiological parameters of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2) were examined. The biomass accumulation and relative growth rate of T1 and T2 seedlings were similar. The T1 seedlings had less biomass allocation to shoots, a lower leaf mass ratio and a lower leaf area ratio; however, they had a greater net assimilation rate (rate of increase in plant mass per unit leaf area), which was associated with a greater net photosynthetic rate. There were no alterations in the concentrations of total chlorophylls or in the chlorophyll a/b ratio when comparing T1 and T2 seedlings. No indications of photoinhibition or photooxidative damage were observed in the T1 plants, which were shown to have a more robust antioxidant system than the T2 plants. Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3) were not capable of utilising the incident extra light to fix CO2. These seedlings showed a remarkable nocturnal retention of zeaxanthin and a significantly increased deepoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, even at predawn, but the activity of antioxidant enzymes was lower than in the T1 and T2 plants. Despite the acclimation capacity of T3 seedlings to the new light environment, they exhibited chronic photoinhibition and considerable photooxidative damage throughout the seven days following the transfer to full sun exposure. We further discuss the practical implications of producing coffee seedlings in full sunlight and under shade.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation and relative growth rate were similar in coffee seedlings produced in full sun and in shade.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
biomass accumulation and relative growth ratee1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The biomass accumulation and relative growth rate of T1 and T2 seedlings were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had less biomass allocation to shoots than shade seedlings.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
biomass allocation to shootse1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The T1 seedlings had less biomass allocation to shoots, a lower leaf mass ratio and a lower leaf area ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a lower leaf mass ratio than shade seedlings.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
leaf mass ratioe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The T1 seedlings had less biomass allocation to shoots, a lower leaf mass ratio and a lower leaf area ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a lower leaf area ratio than shade seedlings.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
leaf area ratioe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The T1 seedlings had less biomass allocation to shoots, a lower leaf mass ratio and a lower leaf area ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a greater net assimilation rate than shade seedlings.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“they had a greater net assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a greater net photosynthetic rate, associated with the greater net assimilation rate.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was associated with a greater net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll concentrations and the chlorophyll a/b ratio did not differ between full-sun and shade seedlings.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
concentrations of total chlorophylls or in the chlorophyll a/b ratioe1
Direction
no alterationse1
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no alterations in the concentrations of total chlorophylls or in the chlorophyll a/b ratio when comparing T1 and T2 seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings showed no indications of photoinhibition or photooxidative damage.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
photoinhibition or photooxidative damagee1
Direction
No indicationse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“No indications of photoinhibition or photooxidative damage were observed in the T1 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sun coffee seedlings had a more robust antioxidant system than shade (T2) plants.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
antioxidant systeme1
Direction
more robuste1
Comparator
T2 plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“which were shown to have a more robust antioxidant system than the T2 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee seedlings transferred from shade to full sun were not capable of utilising the extra incident light to fix CO2.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
transferred from shade to full sune1
Outcome
not capable of utilising the incident extra light to fix CO2e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1158 · show in text ↑
e2

“were not capable of utilising the incident extra light to fix CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings moved from shade to full sun showed a remarkable nocturnal retention of zeaxanthin.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
transferred from shade to full sune1
Outcome
remarkable nocturnal retention of zeaxanthine2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1158 · show in text ↑
e2

“These seedlings showed a remarkable nocturnal retention of zeaxanthin and a significantly increased deepoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, even at predawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings moved from shade to full sun showed a significantly increased deepoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, even at predawn.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
transferred from shade to full sune1
Outcome
deepoxidation state of the xanthophyll cyclee2
Direction
significantly increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1158 · show in text ↑
e2

“These seedlings showed a remarkable nocturnal retention of zeaxanthin and a significantly increased deepoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, even at predawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings moved from shade to full sun had lower antioxidant enzyme activity than T1 and T2 plants.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
transferred from shade to full sune1
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymese2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
T1 and T2 plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1158 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activity of antioxidant enzymes was lower than in the T1 and T2 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite acclimation capacity, seedlings moved to full sun showed chronic photoinhibition and considerable photooxidative damage throughout the seven days after transfer.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
transferred from shade to full sune1
Outcome
chronic photoinhibition and considerable photooxidative damagee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) seedlings produced in full sun (T1) and in shade (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings transferred from shade to full sun (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1158 · show in text ↑
e2

“they exhibited chronic photoinhibition and considerable photooxidative damage throughout the seven days following the transfer to full sun exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1695 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Coffea arabica (arabica coffee)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Coffea arabica (arabica coffee)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Coffea arabica (arabica coffee)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.