Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur treatments increased onion bulb yield by 7.02 to 16.66% versus no sulphur.

A claim from Sulphur Sources and Levels Differential Response on Yield, Storability and Economic Return of Onion (Allium cepa L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur treatments increased onion bulb yield by 7.02 to 16.66% versus no sulphur.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
different sulphur sources and levelse0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.02 to 16.66%e0
Comparator
no sulphure0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across different sulphur sources and levels, bulb yield increased by 7.02 to 16.66% as compared to those of the plants that received no sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–481
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99

Title

Sulphur Sources and Levels Differential Response on Yield, Storability and Economic Return of Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Dinisha Abhishek; Mahaveer Singh Bochalya; Prashant Chauhan; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.101

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cbb2ceec74d286151af3546a94f8a08075a8d493d4397ca58fa8fa821619815e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.