Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar urea at 2 kg N ha(-1) significantly increased wine histamine concentration by 65% versus control.

A claim from Influence of fertilisation with foliar urea on the content of amines in wine · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea at 2 kg N ha(-1) significantly increased wine histamine concentration by 65% versus control.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Tempranillot0
Treatment
2 kg N ha(-1)e0
Outcome
concentration of histaminee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
65%e0
Comparator
control samplee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with foliar urea significantly increased (p < 0.05) the concentration of histamine in the wines compared with the control sample (65% in the treatment with 2 kg N ha(-1) and 93% in the treatment with 4 kg N ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–739
t0

“grapevines of Tempranillo variety were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–412

Title

Influence of fertilisation with foliar urea on the content of amines in wine

C. Ancín-Azpilicueta; R. Nieto-Rojo; J. Gómez-Cordón Food Additives & Contaminants Part A 2011. doi:10.1080/19440049.2011.572293

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-cbfad6219dfc91ddaea94e765d4bf989fc03c7bd4c28b415159a60006e36e61e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.