Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P-based manure amendment enhanced P fertilizer utilization efficiency from 22.01% to 36.69% relative to full chemical fertilization.

A claim from Carbon-phosphorus stoichiometric imbalance induced by manure amendment enhances microbial phosphorus mobilization and crop phosphorus uptake · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-based manure amendment enhanced P fertilizer utilization efficiency from 22.01% to 36.69% relative to full chemical fertilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
P-based manure amendmente1
Outcome
P fertilizer utilization efficiencye1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
from 22.01% to 36.69%e1
Comparator
full chemical fertilizatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“relative to full chemical fertilization, P-based manure amendment increased maize yield by 12%, improved P fertilizer recovery efficiency from 81.34% to 97.06%, enhanced P fertilizer utilization efficiency from 22.01% to 36.69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–2045

Title

Carbon-phosphorus stoichiometric imbalance induced by manure amendment enhances microbial phosphorus mobilization and crop phosphorus uptake

Wangzun Chen; Yanlong Li; Yi Peng; et al. Geoderma 2026. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117711

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cc628c9bb4598a88b3f6dfdf7d7c339e31ea14560b08e0a36f1c5989537fc933 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

other · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.