Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MFP raised grain yield 5.0% against FFP in low fertility soil.

A claim from Effect of Optimized Fertilization on Grain Yield of Rice and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Paddy Fields with Different Basic Soil Fertilities · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MFP raised grain yield 5.0% against FFP in low fertility soil.

Treatment
MFPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.0%e0
Comparator
FFPe0
Setting
low soil fertility field(LSF)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of MFP increased by about 6.9% and 5.0% in the high soil fertility field(HSF) and low soil fertility field(LSF) compared with the treatment of FFP,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–964
e1

“popular middle rice variety Fengliangyouxiang1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–447

Title

Effect of Optimized Fertilization on Grain Yield of Rice and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Paddy Fields with Different Basic Soil Fertilities

Lei Shi Zhongguo nongye Kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cc7cb0ffaf5274aeb6178bdfb26c23e2021beab4b6d09913cc8e56226135737b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.