Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The zero-till-slit seed drill showed lower fuel consumption than the combined tillage and seeding equipment in rice.

A claim from Comparative Evaluation of Zero-till-slit Seed Drill and Combined Tillage and Seeding Equipment in Rice · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zero-till-slit seed drill showed lower fuel consumption than the combined tillage and seeding equipment in rice.

Treatment
zero-till-slit seed drille0
Outcome
fuel consumptione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
combined tillage and seeding equipmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the zero-till-slit seed drill showed higher field capacity higher, field efficiency, lower fuel consumption, lower percentage of wheel slip and lower cone index compared to the combined tillage and seeding equipment tested in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–1025
t0

“Equipment in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–102

Title

Comparative Evaluation of Zero-till-slit Seed Drill and Combined Tillage and Seeding Equipment in Rice

Mohammad Quasim; A.K. Shrivastava; S.K. Rautaray; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.018

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cccd382b24c7ced3af7deccd68279709036af24447015f4cba0ac533110ea92e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Conventional tillage had 16% higher tiller mortality than no-tillage.

    Yield and tillering response of super hybrid rice Liangyoupeijiu to tillage and establishment methods · 2013 · compared with no-tillage (NT)

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Zero tillage had a higher infestation of mealybug, 52-91% infested hills.

    Outburst of pest populations in rice-based cropping systems under conservation agricultural practices in the middle Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45% relative to no tillage.

    Effect of liming, planting time and tillage on system productivity, resource use efficiency and energy dynamics of rice (Oryza sativa) - lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus) cropping system under rainfed lowland condition of North East India · 2017 · compared with No tillage

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    The residue manager increased fuel consumption by 29.6%.

    Evaluation of a Power Driven Residue Manager for No-till Drills · 2011 · compared with no-till drill without RME

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage did not affect rice plant population.

    Tillage Effects on Stand and Yield in a Rice Monoculture System · 2005

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    No-tillage increased soil density by 1.68%-8.01% over conventional tillage.

    Effects of Continuous No-Tillage on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility in Double Rice Cropping System · 2010 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 12.4% compared with no tillage in the rice-based system.

    Effect of liming, planting time and tillage on system productivity, profitability and resource-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems under rainfed valley land condition of North East India · 2001 · compared with no tillage

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Zero tillage fields had higher second-stage juvenile populations.

    Effect of resource conservation practices and conventional practice on population of (Meloidogyne graminicola) affecting different plant growth parameters in rice · 2014

    Opposite direction

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

transplanting · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mechanical transplanting significantly decreased tiller occurrence, dry matter per tiller and population dry matter.

    Effects of Delaying Transplanting on Agronomic Traits and Grain Yield of Rice under Mechanical Transplantation Pattern · 2015 · compared with AT

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Root-parasitic nematode population densities were significantly higher under direct-seeding mulch-based cropping than under conventional tillage in rice.

    Impact of a conservation agriculture system on soil characteristics, rice yield, and root-parasitic nematodes in a Cambodian lowland rice field · 2019 · compared with conventional plough-based tillages

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The residue manager increased fuel consumption by 29.6%.

    Evaluation of a Power Driven Residue Manager for No-till Drills · 2011 · compared with no-till drill without RME

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Populations of LF, GLH and GH per five sweeps were greatest with very late transplanting and least with normal planting.

    Effect of Planting Dates on Incidence of Insect-pests and Their Predators in Rice Field · 2013 · compared with normal planting

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Shoot mortality was higher under continuous and immediate, eight-week and twelve-week waterlogging than under four-week delayed waterlogging.

    The effect of time of irrigation on the growth and yield of transplanted rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) · 1963 · compared with those waterlogged for 4 weeks, 4 weeks after transplanting

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Cartap at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not negatively affect Lvcosa psendoannulaia populations in the rice main field.

    IMPACT OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED IN THE NURSERY ON THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA OF RICE IN THE MAIN FIELD · 1997

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Direct-seeded rice experienced higher tiller mortality later in growth than transplanted rice.

    Effect of Crop Establishment Methods and Nitrogen Levels on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Coarse Rice · 2024 · compared with transplanted (TPR)

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliage feeder damage stayed below one per cent in both direct seeded and transplanted rice, with no significant difference.

    Crop establishment impact on foliage feeders and Leptocorisa acuta in rice · 2017 · compared with transplanting rice

    No difference from an alternative

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.