Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Replacing wheat with coriander markedly improved system productivity.

A claim from Influence of tillage practices and crop diversification on productivity and soil health in maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max) based cropping systems · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing wheat with coriander markedly improved system productivity.

Taxon
maize/soybeanGlycine maxZea mayse0
Treatment
replacement of wheat with coriandere0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
maize/soybean–wheat– greengram systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“replacement of wheat with coriander in maize/soybean–wheat– greengram system also improved the system productivity markedly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1734

Title

Influence of tillage practices and crop diversification on productivity and soil health in maize (Zea mays)/soybean (Glycine max) based cropping systems

DASHARATH PRASAD; D S RANA; SUBHASH BABU; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.56093/ijas.v86i1.55238

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-cd9bec6ba441eede96b35a70234541b01598d5e156b8c6cf04cdec911a12f60e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

Coriandrum sativum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 36 positive, 21 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
    Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn yield.

    Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002 · compared with treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.