Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium sp. inoculant combined with chicken manure increased biomass per plant of groundnut compared with the control.

A claim from Response of peanut quality and yield to chicken manure combined with Rhizobium inoculation in sandy soil · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium sp. inoculant combined with chicken manure increased biomass per plant of groundnut compared with the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
inoculant of Rhizobium sp. strain combined with CMe1
Interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“inoculant of Rhizobium sp. strain combined with CM remarkably increased the yield components per plant such as biomass, number of nodules, weight of dry nodules, weight of fill and empty pods and fresh yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1041
e2

“control treatment (without CM and Rhizobium sp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–638

Title

Response of peanut quality and yield to chicken manure combined with Rhizobium inoculation in sandy soil

Nguyen Van Chuong Communications in Science and Technology 2023. doi:10.21924/cst.8.1.2023.1082

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cdaec0b4d45d9d06ca459dc78ae02621b1698707cec7c0f355fc28c666881f3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

inoculation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 102 positive, 17 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

195 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.