Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur application significantly increased cauliflower yield compared with no sulfur application.

A claim from Critical Limits of Sulfur in Relation to the Growth and Development of French-bean and Cauliflower in Acidic Soils of Northwestern Himalayas · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application significantly increased cauliflower yield compared with no sulfur application.

Treatment
Application of sulfure1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
no application of sulfure1
Setting
under glass housee5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“French-bean and Cauliflower in Acidic Soils of Northwestern Himalayas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–140
e1

“Application of sulfur significantly increased the yield of French-bean and cauliflower as compared to no application of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–786
e5

“under glass house with five levels of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626

Title

Critical Limits of Sulfur in Relation to the Growth and Development of French-bean and Cauliflower in Acidic Soils of Northwestern Himalayas

Gourav; Narender Kumar Sankhyan; Pardeep Kumar; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2021. doi:10.1080/00103624.2021.1921194

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cfcc3979beba5f1ff9174e2ce38aad801b18f207ed722ba68991dc581b86435a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.