Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flood irrigation produced the highest wheat plant height.

A claim from Comparison of the Performance of Commercially Introduced Wheat Varieties with Approved Ones in Terms of Water Requirement in Production Characteristics · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood irrigation produced the highest wheat plant height.

Treatment
flood irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flood irrigation treatment significantly outperformed the other treatments for plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–964
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62

Title

Comparison of the Performance of Commercially Introduced Wheat Varieties with Approved Ones in Terms of Water Requirement in Production Characteristics

Sattar J. Abdel Karim; Faisal Mihbes Madlul Al Taher European journal of ecology, biology and agriculture. 2025. doi:10.59324/ejeba.2025.2(5).07

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d2246fe13b848d99e885a980e857138afc5d1ee23932b7cc630c8b7757fc8e57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 17 positive, 64 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Seminal roots stopped growing during waterlogging.

    Short‐term waterlogging has long‐term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Waterlogging reduced shoot fresh weight of Gamenya, Kite and Muir by 63–82%.

    Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to waterlogging · 1992 · compared with drained plants

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Hypoxia inhibited shoot and root growth, especially roots.

    Root and Shoot Growth of Wheat Genotypes in Response to Hypoxia and Subsequent Resumption of Aeration · 1994

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Waterlogging reduced root growth and penetration.

    Effect of waterlogging on the growth, grain and straw yield of wheat, barley and oats · 1976

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Waterlogging strongly reduced root length, root mass and root/shoot ratio.

    Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages · 2013

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Winter waterlogging decreased tillering.

    Response of winter wheat to prolonged waterlogging under outdoor conditions · 1981

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Flooding significantly reduced wheat development.

    Flooding Causes Dramatic Compositional Shifts and Depletion of Putative Beneficial Bacteria on the Spring Wheat Microbiota · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Waterlogging reduced shoot dry weight by 48% to 85% versus drained treatments.

    Waterlogging Induces High to Toxic Concentrations of Iron, Aluminum, and Manganese in Wheat Varieties on Acidic Soil · 2006 · compared with drained treatments

    Opposite direction

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing irrigation water salinity lowered shoot dry matter, particularly without zinc sulfate.

    Salinity and Zinc Application Effects on Phytoavailability of Cadmium and Zinc · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Aboveground biomass was similar under subsurface drip and flood irrigation.

    Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat · 2019 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Two irrigations inhibited root growth into deeper soil layers.

    Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes Promote the Use of Soil Water and Nitrate Nitrogen from Deep Soil Layers by Regulating Root Growth in Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil water treatment had no effect on kernel growth rate.

    Water and Nitrogen Effects on Winter Wheat in the Southeastern Coastal Plain: I. Grain Yield and Kernel Traits · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Restricted water supply reduced shoot and root biomass in wheat.

    Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Crop and water treatment had no significant effect on wheat growth parameters.

    Intercropping of Faba Bean with Wheat Under Low Water Availability Promotes Faba Bean Nodulation and Root Growth in Deeper Soil Layers · 2015

    Opposite direction

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.