Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined irrigation and silicon treatment significantly enhanced wheat grain yield to 3970 kg/ha.

A claim from Optimization of Irrigation Scheduling and Foliar Spray of Silicon on Growth, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined irrigation and silicon treatment significantly enhanced wheat grain yield to 3970 kg/ha.

Treatment
Irrigation scheduling at 0.8 IW/CPE combined with foliar spray of silicon @ 1.0%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
3970 kg/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation scheduling at 0.8 IW/CPE combined with foliar spray of silicon @ 1.0% significantly enhanced wheat growth, yield attributes and grain yield (3970 kg/ha) and water use efficiency (10.87 kg/ha-mm) of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1290

Title

Optimization of Irrigation Scheduling and Foliar Spray of Silicon on Growth, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat

G. A. Rathva; S. H. Malve; K. A. Solanki; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2024. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124621

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-deb36a3fe567bdea9a8df0335648ca471820d777fea850d642c1c25d3920323f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Silicon at 150 kg ha-1 increased grain yield by 40.29 percent over control.

    Effect of varying levels of silicon and restricted irrigation on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Bhal condition of Gujarat · 2021 · compared with control (S1)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    At the optimum CSS application rate, wheat long-term growth or yield showed no detrimental impact.

    Boosting silica levels in wheat leaves reduces grazing by rabbits · 2006

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar silicon did not affect wheat seed yield.

    Foliar application of silicon and the effect on wheat seed yield and quality · 2013

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Most wheat yield components did not respond to foliar silicon.

    FOLIAR APPLICATION OF SILICON ON YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT CROP · 2017

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil silicon fertilization did not affect wheat yield components.

    Effect of silicon on aphid populations and wheat yield in Minas Gerais, Brazil · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Plant yield did not differ with irrigation depth or silicon application.

    Yield and physiological quality of wheat seeds produced under different irrigation depths and leaf Silicon · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Field silicon application increased wheat yield by 4.1–9.3%.

    Silicon availability and response of rice and wheat to silicon in calcareous soils · 1994

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Lower silicon doses enhanced relative yield and relative water contents.

    Influence of Silicon on Growth, Relative Water Contents and Uptake of Silicon, Calcium and Potassium in Wheat Grown in Nutrient Solution · 2008

    Same direction

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Starting sprays eight weeks after emergence increased yield losses versus starting at emergence.

    Role of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment · 2005 · compared with regular applications started at emergence

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Wheat yield components increased significantly with higher drip irrigation.

    Impact of drip irrigation and N-fertigation scheduling on wheat (Triticum aestivum) under semi-arid tropical environment · 2017 · compared with each higher levels of drip irrigation

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Two irrigations gave significantly superior effective tillers per plant (6.18) to the control and were at par with three irrigations.

    Effect of varying levels of silicon and restricted irrigation on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Bhal condition of Gujarat · 2021 · compared with control (I1)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.