Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn grain yields and ear lengths under calendared treatments were comparable to one hoe weeding at 30 DAS.

A claim from Weed management in grain corn: comparing calendared treatments & use of weed control action indicators (WCAI). · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yields and ear lengths under calendared treatments were comparable to one hoe weeding at 30 DAS.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
Grain yields and ear lengthse0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
both trialse0
Comparator
WCAI plots that received only one hoe weeding (HoW) at 30 DASe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields and ear lengths in plots under CT were comparable to those of WCAI plots that received only one hoe weeding (HoW) at 30 DAS in both trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–730
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29

Title

Weed management in grain corn: comparing calendared treatments & use of weed control action indicators (WCAI).

E. C. Paller; Analiza H. M. Ramirez; E. T. Malenab Crop protection newsletter 2002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-dfc35e263a5bde0333961ae62475093931a630db95cfc7d26d9a3e9c8345b04a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.