Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four irrigations were superior for grain yield (51.464 q/ha).

A claim from Growth Behavior of Wheat Cultivars under Different Irrigation Levels · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations were superior for grain yield (51.464 q/ha).

Treatment
four irrigation CRI, Maximum Tillering, Booting and Milking stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
51.464 q/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34
e0

“four irrigation CRI, Maximum Tillering, Booting and Milking stages shown its superiority in grain yield (51.464 q/ha), straw yield (73.820 q/ha) and gross return (Rs.1,17,467/ha.) net return (Rs.77,642/ha) and B:C ratio (1:3.46).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–984

Title

Growth Behavior of Wheat Cultivars under Different Irrigation Levels

Manoj Kumar Gora M.Z. Siddiqui; Shankar Lal Choudhary International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.026

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e01c36f201558a140891fe95bfdf2acab4db8238695ff83b202d37c363a2f00b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.