Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biochar and compost had positive effects on mung bean plants dependent on their ratio.

A claim from Effects of Biochar and Compost on Mung Bean Growth and Soil Properties in a Semi-arid Area of Northeast China · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and compost had positive effects on mung bean plants dependent on their ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
biochar and composte0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
positive impactse0
Qualifier
dependent upon the biochar to compost ratiose0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar and compost produced positive impacts on both the plants and the soil, with these effects dependent upon the biochar to compost ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–388
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–43

Title

Effects of Biochar and Compost on Mung Bean Growth and Soil Properties in a Semi-arid Area of Northeast China

Gui-Jun Wang; Zhen-Wen Xu; Yu Li International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2016. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0210

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e0438ecb2f8830f4842cf02cd4296fcdd10433e086db616d89aee6bcf875cac1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

biochar · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.