Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar silicon improved plant growth parameters and chlorophyll pigment concentration of wheat under water deficit.

A claim from Influence of foliar application of silicon on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments, and growth in water-stressed wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon improved plant growth parameters and chlorophyll pigment concentration of wheat under water deficit.

Treatment
foliar application of Sie3
Outcome
plant growth parameters and chlorophyll pigment concentratione3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
water deficite3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–168
e3

“foliar application of Si improved plant growth parameters and chlorophyll pigment concentration under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–667

Title

Influence of foliar application of silicon on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments, and growth in water-stressed wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance

KOBRA MAGHSOUDI; YAHYA EMAM; MUHAMMAD ASHRAF TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY 2015. doi:10.3906/bot-1407-11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e04f4de55d687277f6c78880dbce31d3146357b7f18465fdd7fc573b2a39467c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.