Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Preemergence clomazone did not completely control common lambsquarters already emerged at application.

A claim from Influence of Application Time on Clomazone Activity in No-Till Soybeans,Glycine max · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence clomazone did not completely control common lambsquarters already emerged at application.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Preemergence application of clomazonee0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse0
Direction
failed to completely controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preemergence application of clomazone failed to completely control common lambsquarters emerged at the time of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–915
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71

Title

Influence of Application Time on Clomazone Activity in No-Till Soybeans,Glycine max

Virginia L. Werling; Douglas D. Buhler Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075536

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e05c949a858e9b0ead3e03975108a434f4b461b2252725744b725522f4d178d2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

clomazone · Chenopodium album · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Chenopodium album · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.