Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SCF increased yield by 8–9% over two years compared with CF.

A claim from Multi-objective decision-making for efficient utilization of water and fertilizer in paddy fields: A case study in Southern China · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SCF increased yield by 8–9% over two years compared with CF.

Treatment
SCFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8–9%e0
Qualifier
across two yearse0
Comparator
CFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SCF had a significant effect on the nitrogen accumulation at maturity, nitrogen recovery efficiency, N partial factor productivity, yield (increased 8–9% across two years), and protein content (increased ∼8% across two years), but at the cost of higher leachate concentration when compared to CF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1653
e1

“rice yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1213

Title

Multi-objective decision-making for efficient utilization of water and fertilizer in paddy fields: A case study in Southern China

Keji Hua; Jun He; Bin Liao; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108507

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e08ef20feb7f7ff3887731186346869a58aeb896680ca108d66c1d639df02c80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.