Claim · model-written summary
Basal cutting type did not influence chlorophyll content.
- Treatment
- basal cuttinge0
- Outcome
- content of chlorophylle0
- Direction
- never shows it influencee0
- Comparator
- middle cuttinge1
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results indicated that the basal cutting overtopped in shoot length, No. shoots and leaves per plant, root dry weight and rooting percentage, while never shows it influence on the content of chlorophyll.”
t0“Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera L.)”
e1“two types of cuttings (basal and middle cutting)”
Title
Shawkat Atrushi; Hussein Nerway Science Journal of University of Zakho 2015. doi:10.25271/2015.3.2.47
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Basal cuttings outperformed in shoot length and numbers of shoots and leaves.
- Intervention effect Basal cuttings outperformed in root dry weight and rooting percentage.
- Intervention effect The first collection date significantly increased shoot length and shoot and leaf numbers.
- Intervention effect The first collection date significantly increased root dry weight, rooting percentage and chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect The interaction of basal cutting and first collection time had the best significant values.