Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Studies on Season and Intensity of Pruning on Leaf Nutrient Status in Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Red Globe

H.K. Porika; R.M. Vijayakumar; Soorianatha sundaram

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the effect of four different pruning levels on leaf nutrient status and chemical properties of vine with five replications and four treatments in a Randomized block design. Results revealed that, either in rainy or summer season all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.665 mg/g and 1.375 mg/g), chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.494 mg/g and 0.647 mg/g), total chlorophyll content (1.160 mg/g and 2.022 mg/g), total carbohydrate content (14.63% and 15.88%), petiole nitrogen (2.816% and 2.688%), petiole phosphorous (0.827% and 0.864%) and petiole potassium content (2.782% and 2.825%), respectively. Among two seasons, summer season crop performed better than rainy season crop. It was recommended that pruning 50 per cent of the canes for vegetative growth and remaining 50 per cent of canes for crop yield in both seasons were found to be better, considering the performance in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum chlorophyll a (0.665 and 1.375 mg/g)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’e2
Direction
maximume1
Value
0.665 mg/g and 1.375 mg/ge2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.665 mg/g and 1.375 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum chlorophyll b (0.494 and 0.647 mg/g)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘b’e2
Direction
maximume1
Value
0.494 mg/g and 0.647 mg/ge2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.494 mg/g and 0.647 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum total chlorophyll content (1.160 and 2.022 mg/g)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente2
Direction
maximume1
Value
1.160 mg/g and 2.022 mg/ge2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“total chlorophyll content (1.160 mg/g and 2.022 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum total carbohydrate content (14.63% and 15.88%)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
total carbohydrate contente2
Direction
maximume1
Value
14.63% and 15.88%e2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“total carbohydrate content (14.63% and 15.88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum petiole nitrogen (2.816% and 2.688%)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Organ / stage
petiolee2
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
petiole nitrogene2
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.816% and 2.688%e2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“petiole nitrogen (2.816% and 2.688%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum petiole phosphorous (0.827% and 0.864%)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Organ / stage
petiolee2
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
petiole phosphorouse2
Direction
maximume1
Value
0.827% and 0.864%e2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“petiole phosphorous (0.827% and 0.864%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning to 2-bud and 6-bud levels gave the maximum petiole potassium content (2.782% and 2.825%)

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Organ / stage
petiolee2
Treatment
pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud levele1
Outcome
petiole potassium contente2
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.782% and 2.825%e2
Setting
Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the canes of vines which were pruned for 50% of canes to 2 bud level and remaining 50% of canes to 6 bud level registered the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“petiole potassium content (2.782% and 2.825%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer season crop performed better than rainy season crop in grapes

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
summer seasone1
Outcome
performede1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
rainy seasone1

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among two seasons, summer season crop performed better than rainy season crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–971 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning 50% of canes to 2 buds and 50% to 6 buds is recommended in both seasons

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
pruning 50 per cent of the canes for vegetative growth and remaining 50 per cent of canes for crop yielde1

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in grapes cv. Red Globe during 2012-2013 for two seasons namely rainy and summer at Horticultural Orchard, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“pruning 50 per cent of the canes for vegetative growth and remaining 50 per cent of canes for crop yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1117 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.