Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Split fertilization increased panicle number.

A claim from Effects of Split Application of Fertilizaer and Planting Density on Yield, Components of Yield, and Other Agronomic Characters of Rice (III) · 1964

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fertilization increased panicle number.

Treatment
Split fertilizaionse1
Outcome
paniclese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase appeared to be due largely to the increase of panicles and grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–645
e1

“Split fertilizaions generally produced higher yields than conventional one, a difference exceeded the 5% level of probability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–559
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–134

Title

Effects of Split Application of Fertilizaer and Planting Density on Yield, Components of Yield, and Other Agronomic Characters of Rice (III)

W. L. Chang; S. C. Yang 中華農業研究 1964. doi:10.29951/jarc.196412.0001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e2f1d41130eb531dcfc9afc10f8e131cb2267a2ab4fbb525cd52ceb51223fc53 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.