Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF and iron significantly increased leaf CAT, POD and SOD activities under As25.

A claim from Synergistic Reduction of Arsenic Uptake and Alleviation of Leaf Arsenic Toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Exogenous Iron through Antioxidant Activity · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and iron significantly increased leaf CAT, POD and SOD activities under As25.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
co-inoculation with AMF and Fe compound additione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
As25 treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation with AMF and Fe compound addition significantly increased the activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the leaves of maize under As25 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1309

Title

Synergistic Reduction of Arsenic Uptake and Alleviation of Leaf Arsenic Toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Exogenous Iron through Antioxidant Activity

Hong-Yin Zhou; Fu-Zhao Nian; Bao-Dong Chen; et al. Journal of Fungi 2023. doi:10.3390/jof9060677

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e3114f08f87b5f13e19735af2c1e9c5d8b4f66f5a8f1b4a19841e543be9f787e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

iron atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.