Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Summer tillage with glyphosate controlled bindweed seed bank establishment.

A claim from Seed Bank Density and Weed Flora Dynamics of Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) as Affected by Different Tillage Systems in Rainfed Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer tillage with glyphosate controlled bindweed seed bank establishment.

Treatment
tillage systems along with glyphosate in summer seasone0
Interactor
Bindweedt1weed
Outcome
establishment of seed bank densitye0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
conventional tillage treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–154
t1

“Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76
e0

“tillage systems along with glyphosate in summer season controlled the establishment of seed bank density as observed in conventional tillage treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–595

Title

Seed Bank Density and Weed Flora Dynamics of Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) as Affected by Different Tillage Systems in Rainfed Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Safdar Ali International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2015. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0031

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e329535307f55bb181512008461f749a8e5b4294cb02889e054962abfc47c32b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 7 positive, 19 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

climate site · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.