Intervention effectmodel-written summary

One ppm WEBB increased early stem growth by 16.39%.

A claim from Tomato Growth and Production under Different Concentrations of Weed Extract-Based Biostimulant in Dry Season · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One ppm WEBB increased early stem growth by 16.39%.

Treatment
WEBB at 1 ppme0
Outcome
early growth of steme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.39%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WEBB at 1 ppm significantly increased early growth of stem and the number of leaves at 2 WAP by 16.39% and 39.02% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1016
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6

Title

Tomato Growth and Production under Different Concentrations of Weed Extract-Based Biostimulant in Dry Season

Fadil Rohman; Refa Firgiyanto; Gallyndra Fatkhu Dinata; et al. International Journal of Technology Food and Agriculture 2025. doi:10.25047/tefa.v2i2.6120

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e32f3fab678ab19ef0e815596a9fdaabb1305b39d4e213cad56f2579011bd86c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    HA had no significant effect on tomato dry mass accumulation.

    Humic Substances Generally Ineffective in Improving Vegetable Crop Nutrient Uptake or Productivity · 2010

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Biochar amendment did not significantly change tomato fruit size and weight parameters.

    Influence of biochar application on nutritional quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) · 2015

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Biochar decreased dry root weight by 13%.

    Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation and biochar amendment on growth and yield of tomato. · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Gel amendment did not affect tomato seedling growth.

    Influence of Gel Additives on Nitrate, Ammonium, and Water Retention and Tomato Growth in a Soilless Medium · 1993

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Germination percent of tomato seeds was not significantly affected by desiccant drying and remained the same as the control.

    POST HARVEST DRYING OF TOMATO (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) SEEDS TO ULTRA LOW MOISTURE SAFE FOR STORAGE USING DESICCANT (ZEOLITE) BEADS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SEED QUALITY · 2014 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Compost amendments above 7.5% reduced tomato seedling growth rate, most evidently at 30%.

    Growth of Tomato and Zucchini Seedlings in Orange Waste Compost Media: pH and Implication of Dosage · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Vermicompost had no significant effect on tomato height.

    Vermicompost soil amendment influences yield, growth responses and nutritional value of Kale (Brassica oleracea Acephala group), Radish (Raphanus sativus) and Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) · 2021 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Biostimulants caused no significant change in classical molecular markers of pollen tube growth.

    Two Carbohydrate-Based Natural Extracts Stimulate in vitro Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth of Tomato Under Cold Temperatures · 2021 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

166 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Removal of yeast extract had no significant effect on the growth-promoting traits of CB7.

    Efficiency of plant growth‐promoting P‐solubilizing Bacillus circulans CB7 for enhancement of tomato growth under net house conditions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    All cover crop extracts initially delayed tomato germination.

    Comparison of the Allelopathic Potential of Leguminous Summer Cover Crops: Cowpea, Sunn Hemp, and Velvetbean · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Callicarpa leachate inhibited tomato radicle growth by 47%.

    Allelochemical stress produced by the aqueous leachate of Callicarpa acuminata: effects on roots of bean, maize, and tomato · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increasing Mikania extract concentrations progressively decreased germination, radicle length and fresh weight of tomato.

    Effects of aqueous extracts and decomposition of Mikania micrantha H.B.K. debris on selected agronomic crops · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Treating tomato seeds with the three retested extracts had no effect on seedling vigor, height, or weight.

    The effect of plant extracts as seed treatments to control bacterial leaf spot of tomato in Tanzania · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    The essential oils had no remarkable effect on tomato germination and growth.

    In vitro antifungal activity of four chemotypes of Lippia alba (Verbenaceae) essential oils against Alternaria solani (Pleosporeaceae) isolates · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    tomato germination was reduced by 100% by sunnhemp leaf extract.

    Allelopathic Effects of Sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) on Germination of Vegetables and Weeds · 2012 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Cold and hot pine substrate extracts reduced tomato germination and radicle growth.

    Laboratory bioassay and greenhouse evaluation of a pine tree substrate used as a container substrate · 2009

    Opposite direction

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.