Intervention effectmodel-written summary

WUE increased 20.3% in LH2 under PRD.

A claim from Physiological and Morphological Basis of Improved Water‐Use‐Efficiency in Wheat from Partial Root‐Zone Drying · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE increased 20.3% in LH2 under PRD.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
LH2e1
Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
water‐use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.3%e0
Comparator
full irrigation (FI)e2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water‐use efficiency (WUE) significantly increased by 17.2 and 20.3% under PRD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–732
e1

“KN9204 and LH2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–634
e2

“PRD and full irrigation (FI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–813
t0

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–86

Title

Physiological and Morphological Basis of Improved Water‐Use‐Efficiency in Wheat from Partial Root‐Zone Drying

Changhai Shi; Baodi Dong; Yunzhou Qiao; et al. Crop Science 2014. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0732

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e3fd9cd5079c0a39cdfe6de03633a95f2e6312f54a94cb9c83c90a9e8a2f4eb1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Irrigation did not affect grain water-use efficiency.

    Root Growth, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in Winter Wheat Under Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes in North China Plain · 2018

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Irrigation left water use efficiency unaffected.

    Irrigation strategy, nitrogen application and fungicide control in winter wheat on a sandy soil. I. Yield, yield components and nitrogen uptake · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    More irrigation decreased crop water use efficiency.

    Grain yield and water use of winter wheat as affected by water and sulfur supply in the North China Plain · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Irrigation at 90 mm per time reduced water productivity.

    Effects of differential irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement on winter wheat yield and water productivity and nitrogen-use efficiency · 2023

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    With half the normal irrigation amount, frequency did not affect WUE in most seasons.

    Effects of irrigation frequency under limited irrigation on root water uptake, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat · 2008 · compared with normal irrigation amount

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Higher irrigation reduced irrigation water use efficiency by 10.3 % - 60.5 %.

    Investigating the impacts of different degrees of deficit irrigation and nitrogen interactions on assimilate translocation, yield, and resource use efficiencies in winter wheat · 2024

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Limited water reduced wheat water use by 37%.

    Dissection of drought response of modern and underutilized wheat varieties according to Passioura's yield-water framework · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Irrigation decreased water use efficiency.

    Effects of row spacing on soil water and water consumption of winter wheat under irrigated and rainfed conditions · 2011

    Opposite direction

294 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.