Intervention effectmodel-written summary

STF gave the highest 0–20 cm soil water content in 2018, 4.89–11.31% above other treatments.

A claim from Optimizing Tillage and Fertilization Patterns to Improve Soil Physical Properties, NUE and Economic Benefits of Wheat-Maize Crop Rotation Systems · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STF gave the highest 0–20 cm soil water content in 2018, 4.89–11.31% above other treatments.

Taxon
Winter wheat and summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
STF treatmente0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.89–11.31%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the STF treatment, soil water content was highest in the 0–20 cm layer (2018), which was 4.89–11.31% higher than that of the other treatments; additional organic fertilizer application reduced soil bulk and increased the proportion of <0.25 mm aggregates; SOC and soil total nitrogen (TN) content were highest in the 20–40 cm layer, (15.82–32.63% and 28.57–42.86%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1409
e1

“Winter wheat and summer maize rotation is the main cropping pattern in the North China Plain (NCP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99

Title

Optimizing Tillage and Fertilization Patterns to Improve Soil Physical Properties, NUE and Economic Benefits of Wheat-Maize Crop Rotation Systems

Daijing Zhang; Xinru Hao; Zhiyao Fan; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture12081264

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e415849351d4d1dc3e33bb3812664fba5442a22d31bd4b429653808883d5135e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.