Abstract
Through field experiment, the effect of N and P fertilizer on the productivity and quality of high quality and gluten wheat has been studied. The results showed that the combination of N and P fertilizer improved the product of wheat by 21.3%~37.9%, and improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively, but its effect of sedimentation value was little. \;
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat product by 21.3%~37.9%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- combination of N and P fertilizere0
- Outcome
- product of wheate0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 21.3%~37.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the combination of N and P fertilizer improved the product of wheat by 21.3%~37.9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat protein content by 1.2%~5.5%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N and P fertilizert0
- Outcome
- content of proteine0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.2%~5.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively”
t0“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat wet gluten content by 2.8%~5.7%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N and P fertilizert0
- Outcome
- wet glutene0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 2.8%~5.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively”
t0“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined N and P fertilizer had little effect on wheat sedimentation value.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N and P fertilizert0
- Outcome
- sedimentation valuee0
- Direction
- littlee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“but its effect of sedimentation value was little”
t0“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →phosphorus · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →phosphorus · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nitrogen · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →fertilization · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
450 papers more in this group
See all 454 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.