Paper · 2003 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Effect of N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat

Pei Xue

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Through field experiment, the effect of N and P fertilizer on the productivity and quality of high quality and gluten wheat has been studied. The results showed that the combination of N and P fertilizer improved the product of wheat by 21.3%~37.9%, and improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively, but its effect of sedimentation value was little. \;

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat product by 21.3%~37.9%.

Treatment
combination of N and P fertilizere0
Outcome
product of wheate0
Direction
improvede0
Value
21.3%~37.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of N and P fertilizer improved the product of wheat by 21.3%~37.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat protein content by 1.2%~5.5%.

Treatment
N and P fertilizert0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1.2%~5.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P fertilizer improved wheat wet gluten content by 2.8%~5.7%.

Treatment
N and P fertilizert0
Outcome
wet glutene0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.8%~5.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved the content of protein and wet gluten by 1.2%~5.5% and 2.8%~5.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P fertilizer had little effect on wheat sedimentation value.

Treatment
N and P fertilizert0
Outcome
sedimentation valuee0
Direction
littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but its effect of sedimentation value was little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“N and P fertilizer on the product and quality of high quality and gluten wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–88 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

phosphorus · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 31 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 36 positive, 18 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 98 positive, 27 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.