Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Developed furrow irrigation with improved management practices raised IWUE by 23.4%.

A claim from ACCLIMATIZATION FODDER BEET PLANTS UNDER TWO IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN SALINE SOILS AT SAHL EL-TINA - NORTH SINAI · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Developed furrow irrigation with improved management practices raised IWUE by 23.4%.

Taxon
Beta vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Material
Monoverte0
Treatment
Developed furrow irrigation with improved management practicese3
Outcome
IWUEe3
Direction
highere3
Value
23.4%e3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder beet plant (Beta vulgaris L. Monovert)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–158
e3

“Developed furrow irrigation with improved management practices resulted in higher IWUE by 23.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1733

Title

ACCLIMATIZATION FODDER BEET PLANTS UNDER TWO IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN SALINE SOILS AT SAHL EL-TINA - NORTH SINAI

H. S. Khafaga; H. A. M. Hiekal; A .S. Abdel-Nabi; et al. Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2017. doi:10.21608/mjppf.2017.176374

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e44bda14824174bd804e6e115e97a6aa24f48b28df3f6e69ece344429f526d9f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.