Claim · model-written summary
Soluble solids were 2.3 Bx higher with root restriction and P.E. mulching than in flat field.
- Taxon
- Satsuma Mandarin
Citrus unshiut0 - Treatment
- root restriction+P.E. mulchinge0
- Outcome
- soluble solids levele1
- Value
- 2.3 Bxe0
- Comparator
- flat fielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It showed 2.3 Bx difference between flat field and root restriction+P.E. mulching”
t0“Satsuma Mandarin”
e1“Generally, the soluble solids level is considered to be representing the fruit quality.”
Title
Il-Rae Rno; Yong‐Ho Kim; Sang-Uk Koh; et al. Horticultural Science & Technology 2002
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Fruit weight tended to decrease under root restriction or root restriction plus mulching relative to flat field.
- Intervention effect Peel thickness decreased by 0.4 mm relative to flat field.
- Intervention effect Acidity varied similarly to soluble solids across planting systems but differences were not significant.
- Observation Soil moisture potential decreased across flat field, ridge-up bed, root restriction and root restriction with P.E. mulching.
- Observation Only root restriction plus P.E. mulching reached -1.3 Mpa at 20 cm soil depth in 100 days.
- Observation Diffusion resistance increased across the listed planting systems.
- Association Transpiration volume decreased as diffusion resistance increased.