Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat seed soaking with Azotobacter vinelandii culture filtrate significantly increased germination.

A claim from Synergistic Effect between Azotobacter vinelandii and Streptomyces sp. Isolated From Saline Soil on Seed Germination and Growth of Wheat Plant · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed soaking with Azotobacter vinelandii culture filtrate significantly increased germination.

Treatment
Soaking wheat seeds in either Azotobacter vinelandii (AZ)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie0symbiont
Outcome
wheat germinatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking wheat seeds in either Azotobacter vinelandii (AZ) or Streptomyces sp. (ST) or both culture filtrates (AZ+ST) increased significantly wheat germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–679

Title

Synergistic Effect between Azotobacter vinelandii and Streptomyces sp. Isolated From Saline Soil on Seed Germination and Growth of Wheat Plant

Magda M. Aly; Hameda El-Sayed; Ahmed El Sayed; et al. ˜The œjournal of American science 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e6498041753607be7a24d5e97132de66fe654d1d03e0077941763fc3e277b448 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter vinelandii · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

298 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.