Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The ratio of chlorophyll a to b showed no significant difference between SPIONs and conventional iron chelate in soybean.

A claim from Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles on Soybean Chlorophyll · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of chlorophyll a to b showed no significant difference between SPIONs and conventional iron chelate in soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
SPIONse2
Outcome
ratio of chlorophyll a to be2
Direction
no significant differencee2
Comparator
conventional growth medium iron chelatee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean Chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–57
e2

“The equivalent ratio of chlorophyll a to b, in all treatments with conventional growth medium iron chelate and SPIONs (as iron source), indicated no significant difference on the photosynthesis efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1061

Title

Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles on Soybean Chlorophyll

Mohammad H. Ghafariyan; Mohammad J. Malakouti; Mohammad R. Dadpour; et al. Environmental Science & Technology 2013. doi:10.1021/es402249b

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e67cb80861e23f896a9e3ac5e2d775498c6e755555e2a537c0570600260b0692 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.