Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual DTPA-extractable Cu in the soil increased under soil incorporation of Cu lignosulphonate, Cu sulphate and Cu oxysulphate II, particularly at 2 kg Cu ha -1.

A claim from Relative effectiveness of various sources, methods, times and rates of copper fertilizers in improving grain yield of wheat on a Cu-deficient soil · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual DTPA-extractable Cu in the soil increased under soil incorporation of Cu lignosulphonate, Cu sulphate and Cu oxysulphate II, particularly at 2 kg Cu ha -1.

Treatment
Cu lignosulphonate, Cu sulphate and Cu oxysulphate II soil incorporation treatmentse7
Outcome
residual DTPA-extractable Cue7
Direction
increasee7
Qualifier
particularly at the 2 kg Cu ha -1 ratee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–123
e7

“There was some increase in residual DTPA-extractable Cu in the 0–60 cm soil in Cu lignosulphonate, Cu sulphate and Cu oxysulphate II soil incorporation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2203
e2

“particularly at the 2 kg Cu ha -1 rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2205–2243

Title

Relative effectiveness of various sources, methods, times and rates of copper fertilizers in improving grain yield of wheat on a Cu-deficient soil

S. S. Malhi; L. Cowell; H. R. Kutcher Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2005. doi:10.4141/p04-089

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e71565bd3304585f29de3b752f708b71c3b66c989d6fa1596a378ca11219bece · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.