Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano iron oxide foliar application with supplementary irrigation at booting increased chlorophyll content, nitrogen percentage and relative water content compared to non-application.

A claim from Effects of nano iron oxide on yield, chlorophyll fluorescence indices and some physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rain fed and supplementary irrigation conditions · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano iron oxide foliar application with supplementary irrigation at booting increased chlorophyll content, nitrogen percentage and relative water content compared to non-application.

Treatment
0.9 g L -1 nano iron oxide application and supplementary irrigation at booting stagee0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, nitrogen percentage, relative water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-application of nano iron oxidee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Means comparison showed that 0.9 g L -1 nano iron oxide application and supplementary irrigation at booting stage increased maximum fluorescence (F m ), variable fluorescence (F v ), chlorophyll content, nitrogen percentage, relative water content and grain yield compared to non-application of nano iron oxide under rain fed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–966
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–131

Title

Effects of nano iron oxide on yield, chlorophyll fluorescence indices and some physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rain fed and supplementary irrigation conditions

Hamed Narimani; Raouf Seyed sharifi; Razieh khalilzadeh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2018. doi:10.22108/ijpb.2018.110895.1098

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e84e8954abfbe95d44f562a3480d2f7d3048a4d45518115d5f7f6c91b75809e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

294 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.