Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Molybdenum at 1 kg ha–1 raised haulm yield to 18.64 g plant-1 versus control.

A claim from Effect of different levels of boron and molybdenum on growth and yield of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under medium black calcareous soils of south Saurashtra region of Gujarat · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum at 1 kg ha–1 raised haulm yield to 18.64 g plant-1 versus control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
1 kg ha–1 (Mo2) molybdenume0
Outcome
haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.64 g plant-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1 kg ha–1 (Mo2) molybdenum results maximum number of pegs per plant (21.78), No. of nodules (95.01), nodule dry weight (0.236 g), pods per plant (9.58), shelling % (68.89). Also higher pod yield (18.23 g plant-1), haulm yield (18.64 g plant-1) which were significantly higher than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1367
t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–112

Title

Effect of different levels of boron and molybdenum on growth and yield of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under medium black calcareous soils of south Saurashtra region of Gujarat

D.V. Hirpara; H. L. Sakarvadia; CM Savaliya; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e870ce10072694f290cd7cb954755c324ec0ab5338540fd84bbc0477438f78c2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    No. of kernal yield/pod was significantly higher under T9 than other treatment (2).

    Effect of boron and molybdenum on growth rate and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) · 2020 · compared with other treatment

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

    YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Co and Mo doses did not affect pod yield.

    Cobalt and molybdenum stimulate compounds of primary metabolism, nitrogen forms, and photosynthetic pigments in peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    B and Mo fertilization did not increase unshelled nut yield.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE - POD YIELD RELATIONSHIP DUE TO MACRO AND MICRONUTRIENTS IN RAINFED SPANISH GROUNDNUT · 1984

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Omission of Mo did not change peanut seed yield.

    Diagnosing multiple nutrient deficiencies that limit crop growth and yield on sands in south-central coastal Vietnam · 2015

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  6. no effect
    Fe, Mn, Cu, Mo and B showed no significant promotion of peanut growth and yield.

    Effects of Microelements on the Growth and Development and Yield of Continuous Cropping Peanut · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Mo without lime raised peanut yield by 28%.

    Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils · 2004 · compared with without liming

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The highest reported pod yield under 3g of molybdenum per liter was 2320 kg per hectare.

    Study the Effect of Foliar Application of Nano chelate Molybdenum Fertilizer on the Yield and Yield Components of Peanut · 2014

    Same direction

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.