Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Terrace irrigation with compost and melatonin maximized grain and biological yield.

A claim from Response of maize plant grown under water deficit stress to compost and melatonin under terraces and alternate furrow irrigation techniques · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terrace irrigation with compost and melatonin maximized grain and biological yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
terraces irrigation technique with compost and simultaneously sprayed with melatonin at rate of 2.0 mmol L-1e0
Outcome
grain and biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of growth parameters and chemical constitutes at 70 days from sowing (fresh and dry weight, leaf area chlorophyll content ,N,P,K) as well as yield and its components and bio chemical traits of grains at harvest stage e.g., weight of 1000 grain , cob length, No. of rows cob-1 , grain and biological yield, total carbohydrates, protein and oil content in grain were recorded when the maize plants were grown under terraces irrigation technique with compost and simultaneously sprayed with melatonin at rate of 2.0 mmol L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1755

Title

Response of maize plant grown under water deficit stress to compost and melatonin under terraces and alternate furrow irrigation techniques

mohamed elsherpiny; Amal Helmy Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2022. doi:10.21608/ejss.2022.165573.1544

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e91c55a3f5d47a11222766abee212e07e560fccd7d345c6b9c1cee94455a6a11 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

melatonin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this claim · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.