Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl effectively controlled the density and dry weight of grassy and broadleaf weeds.

A claim from Impact of establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and yield of wheat · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl effectively controlled the density and dry weight of grassy and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha)e3
Interactor
grassy and broadleaf weedse3weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weedse3
Direction
controllede3
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse3
Setting
Jabalpur, Madhya Pradeshe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227
e3

“Among the herbicidal treatments, the application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) effectively controlled the density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weeds, resulting in 87.63% and 83.93% higher grain yield compared to the other weed control treatments during both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1293
e4

“A field experiment was conducted at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108

Title

Impact of establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and yield of wheat

Monika Raghuwanshi; Namrata Jain; VK Choudhary; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i1sg.2475

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e92101c8be70f42d0e9b8eadecfa1e5008c287c59e5d682f77c57bcaba343ea1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.