Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Impact of establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and yield of wheat

Monika Raghuwanshi; Namrata Jain; VK Choudhary; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24 to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications, comprising four establishment methods in the main plots: zero tillage, zero tillage with chemical stale seedbed, conventional tillage, and conventional tillage with stale seedbed. Four weed control treatments were assigned to the subplots: clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) as post-emergence, mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl sodium (12 + 2.4 g/ha) as post-emergence, hand weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS), and a weedy check. Among the establishment methods, conventional tillage with stale seedbed significantly reduced the total weed population and weed biomass, whereas zero tillage increased weed density and dry matter. Among the herbicidal treatments, the application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) effectively controlled the density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weeds, resulting in 87.63% and 83.93% higher grain yield compared to the other weed control treatments during both years of the study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with stale seedbed significantly reduced the total weed population and weed biomass.

Treatment
conventional tillage with stale seedbede1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed population and weed biomasse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the establishment methods, conventional tillage with stale seedbed significantly reduced the total weed population and weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage increased weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
zero tillagee2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed density and dry mattere2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas zero tillage increased weed density and dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl effectively controlled the density and dry weight of grassy and broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha)e3
Interactor
grassy and broadleaf weedse3weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weedse3
Direction
controllede3
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse3
Setting
Jabalpur, Madhya Pradeshe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the herbicidal treatments, the application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) effectively controlled the density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weeds, resulting in 87.63% and 83.93% higher grain yield compared to the other weed control treatments during both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1293 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl gave 87.63% higher grain yield than the other weed control treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha)e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
87.63%e3
Qualifier
during both years of the studye3
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the herbicidal treatments, the application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) effectively controlled the density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weeds, resulting in 87.63% and 83.93% higher grain yield compared to the other weed control treatments during both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl gave 83.93% higher grain yield than the other weed control treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha)e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
83.93%e3
Qualifier
during both years of the studye3
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the influence of different establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed dynamics and wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the herbicidal treatments, the application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (60 + 4 g/ha) effectively controlled the density and dry weight of both grassy and broadleaf weeds, resulting in 87.63% and 83.93% higher grain yield compared to the other weed control treatments during both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1293 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.