Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In transplanted rice, 100% RDF plus rice straw at 5 t/ha gave higher grain yield, 4.9 and 4.5 t/ha.

A claim from Production potential, profitability and energetics of transplanted rice as influenced by establishment methods and nutrient management practices in Eastern Himalaya · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In transplanted rice, 100% RDF plus rice straw at 5 t/ha gave higher grain yield, 4.9 and 4.5 t/ha.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
100% RDF+rice straw 5 t/hae5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
4.9 and 4.5 t/hae5
Setting
hill ecosystem of Nagalande1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–71
e1

“under the hill ecosystem of Nagaland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–363
e5

“application of 100% RDF+rice straw 5 t/ha produced the higher grain yield (4.9 and 4.5 t/ha) followed by 100% RDN (farm yard manure)+rice straw @ 5 t/ha (4.7 and 5.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1101

Title

Production potential, profitability and energetics of transplanted rice as influenced by establishment methods and nutrient management practices in Eastern Himalaya

Rakesh Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Bidyut C. Deka Research on Crops 2015. doi:10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00088.1

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e9a287dfe58dcc83abcca7be41329a613b1eb59dacff852821ec4019abc7af1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.