Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RDF with foliar Zn and B spray gave a significant yield effect of 31.84 t/ha compared with treatments without Zn and B.

A claim from Responses of potato to different methods of zinc and boron application in midhills of Nepal · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with foliar Zn and B spray gave a significant yield effect of 31.84 t/ha compared with treatments without Zn and B.

Treatment
RDF +Zn +B foliar spraye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
31.84 t/hae0
Comparator
treatments without Zn and Be0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Responses of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19
e0

“Among seven treatments, T6 (RDF +Zn +B foliar spray) showed a significant effect on yield (31.84 t/ha) and its variables including vigor, uniformity and ground cover of potato followed by T5 (28.81 t/ha) and T7 compared to the treatments without Zn and B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1087

Title

Responses of potato to different methods of zinc and boron application in midhills of Nepal

Reena Sharma; Keshab Raj Pande; Kalika Upadhyay; et al. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science 2024. doi:10.26832/24566632.2024.0904024

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-edc5df02ee83c83e19ae4ef3ea8ccc54a70eb649e949315092213fdb88f6d005 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

182 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

441 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.