Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IBA treatment gave peak rooting of 100% at 1.0 mg/L in grapevine microcuttings.

A claim from Effect of the culture liquid of Antarctic yeast Nadsoniella nigra on rooting, growth, and biochemical composition of in vitro grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivar 'Karmrahyut' · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA treatment gave peak rooting of 100% at 1.0 mg/L in grapevine microcuttings.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
IBA treatmente1
Outcome
peak rootinge1
Direction
peake1
Value
100% rootinge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–155
e1

“IBA treatment resulted in peak rooting at 1.0 mg/L (100% rooting) but decreased at higher concentrations, accompanied by callus formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2111

Title

Effect of the culture liquid of Antarctic yeast Nadsoniella nigra on rooting, growth, and biochemical composition of in vitro grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivar 'Karmrahyut'

Gayane Melyan; Aghvan Sahakyan; Andranik Barseghyan; et al. Functional Foods in Health and Disease 2024. doi:10.31989/ffhd.v14i10.1474

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ee5a755c5ed45a3eb04e3ff31c39de46eb17714b54bdbaf27c994aa4a8464318 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.