Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The S6 nutrient treatment produced crude protein content of 14.65 and 14.93% in maize.

A claim from Production potential of maize under agronomic biofortification · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The S6 nutrient treatment produced crude protein content of 14.65 and 14.93% in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nutrient levels at 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM with Fe and Zn as foliar application @0.5% conc (S6)e0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
significant resultse0
Value
14.65 and 14.93%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that nutrient levels at 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM with Fe and Zn as foliar application @0.5% conc (S6) at 45 (active vegetative stage) and 90 (grain filling stage) days after sowing (DAS) showed significant results in terms of growth attributes like, plant height, leaf area index, dry-matter accumulation, reduced days taken to 50% tasselling and 50% silking, and yield attributes like, cob length, no. of grains/row, cob weight, test weight, and yield like grain yield (8.27 and 8.52 t/ha) and stover yield (10.16 and 10.35 t/ha), and grain quality like crude protein content (14.65 and 14.93%), starch content (63.85 and 65.42 mg/g), Fe (37.80 and 36.25 mg/kg) and Zn (31.88 and 29.35 mg/kg) of maize grain in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1628

Title

Production potential of maize under agronomic biofortification

Research on Crops 2022. doi:10.31830/2348-7542.2022.009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-eee928101348bcd82da0e034e4082a5e2ccf28377d0407b809681db394ca8451 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

application · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 61 positive, 1 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.