Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Microelement water soluble fertilizer had the best effect on economic benefits, with an economic increase of 13 387 Yuan/hm2.

A claim from Effect of Nectarine Quality and Economic Benefits of Six Water Soluble Fertilizers in Solar Greenhouse · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microelement water soluble fertilizer had the best effect on economic benefits, with an economic increase of 13 387 Yuan/hm2.

Treatment
microelement water soluble fertilizee1
Outcome
economic benefitse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
13 387 Yuan/hm2e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the 6 water soluble fertilizer could increase nectarine's output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–376
e1

“especially microelement water soluble fertilize,which had the best effect on economic benefits and output to cost ratio,with output and economic increase 7.89% and 13 387 Yuan/hm2 respectively,and with output to ratio 33.1∶1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–601

Title

Effect of Nectarine Quality and Economic Benefits of Six Water Soluble Fertilizers in Solar Greenhouse

YI Yu-lin Northern Horticulture 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-f524432728355ce2649fa5b235d4e1cec32795640185c13cf8debae525c69003 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.