Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Relative feed value and total digestible nutrients of no fertilizer plots were significantly higher than the other plots.

A claim from The Effect of Application of Cattle Slurry on Dry Matter Yield and Feed Values of Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in Uncultivated Rice Paddy · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative feed value and total digestible nutrients of no fertilizer plots were significantly higher than the other plots.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
no fertilizer plotse1
Outcome
relative feed value (RFV) and total digestible nutrients (TDN)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the other plotse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–123
e1

“relative feed value (RFV) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) of no fertilizer plots were significantly (P<0.05) higher than the other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3707–3848

Title

The Effect of Application of Cattle Slurry on Dry Matter Yield and Feed Values of Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in Uncultivated Rice Paddy

Jo, Ik-Hwan Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science 2007. doi:10.5333/kgfs.2007.27.1.009

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-fb5fa6560f42a807d853c26784a8c12c78b5c8f2b51ce39380b50c213a54b62d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.