Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined compost and fertilizer treatment performed best for rice LAI and DMP.
Treatmentbone sludge compost @ 5 t/ha + Pressmud compost @ 5 t/ha, along with balanced N and K through fertilizers e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Comparator Setting Value Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “the combination of bone sludge compost @ 5 t/ha + Pressmud compost @ 5 t/ha, along with balanced N and K through fertilizers, exhibits superior performance in LAI and DMP. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1304 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 Other claims from this paper (2) Record rev-fe3b4725aa2ca29acf70d87f721c9f9aef891ba16581bae1b4acaf8aa9f7340e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer
organic · growth · Oryza sativa (rice) Results differ 79 papers: 64 positive, 15 negative or no effect
63 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
negative negative negative negative negative negative negative negative 70 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers → potassium · growth · Oryza sativa (rice) Positive and negative results 95 papers: 81 positive, 14 negative or no effect
80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction
negative no effect negative negative negative negative negative no effect 86 papers more in this group
See all 95 papers → nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice) Positive and negative results 511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect
401 papers in the same direction as this claim · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
negative negative negative negative no effect negative negative negative 502 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers → 3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.