Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation with rhizobia and nitrogen with manure increased shoot and root dry weights.

A claim from Effect of Bio-Organic and Mineral Nitrogen Starter Dose on Growth and Production of Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Malakal Area · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with rhizobia and nitrogen with manure increased shoot and root dry weights.

Taxon
GroundnutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Nitrogen at the rate of 20 kg N ha -1 with inoculation with rhizobia coupled with either manurese0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94
e0

“Nitrogen at the rate of 20 kg N ha -1 with inoculation with rhizobia coupled with either manures resulted in a significant increment in shoot and root dry weights compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–720

Title

Effect of Bio-Organic and Mineral Nitrogen Starter Dose on Growth and Production of Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Malakal Area

Upper Nile 2011

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-fe9c3fe2feeef517d286b06247752b46586f5eae90d748b0231d76e2a761b34b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 102 positive, 17 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

195 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.