Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation water salinity negatively affected grain and straw yields of wheat and maize.

A claim from Effect of Gypsum, K-Humate and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on Improvement of Soil Properties and Productivity of Wheat and Maize Irrigated by Saline Water · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: wheat and maizeTriticum aestivum Zea mayse1
Treatment: irrigation water salinitye1
Outcome: grain and straw yieldse1
Direction: negatively affectede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

*Zea mays* · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1
“plant height, grain filling, grain and straw yields of wheat and maize were negatively affected by irrigation water salinity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–804

Title

Effect of Gypsum, K-Humate and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on Improvement of Soil Properties and Productivity of Wheat and Maize Irrigated by Saline Water

Hesham Aboelsoud Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2020. doi:10.21608/jssae.2020.103587

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Irrigation water salinity negatively affected plant height and grain filling of wheat and maize.
Intervention effect Irrigation water salinity clearly affected soil ECe and ESP.
Intervention effect Irrigation water salinity slightly affected soil bulk density and total porosity.
Intervention effect Gypsum, K-humate and PGPR slightly affected soil ECe and ESP.
Intervention effect Gypsum, K-humate and PGPR slightly affected soil bulk density and total porosity.
Intervention effect Gypsum application positively affected biomass yield, plant height and grain filling in both crops.
Intervention effect Gypsum application alleviated the adverse effects of salinity on crop growth.
Intervention effect K-humate with PGPR positively affected crop yield and its attributes.
Intervention effect Bio amendments alleviated the harmful effects of salinity stress on wheat and maize.
Intervention effect 100% gypsum combined with higher rate of K-humate and PGPR was the more effective treatment on plant growth.
Intervention effect 100% gypsum combined with higher rate of K-humate and PGPR alleviated the harmful effects of salinity stress on plant growth.

Record rev-ffd148725887c010d20bd4bf4a393c1e7faa7af239e53335d8bcb37a7cabfda3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

salinity · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

70 papers: 9 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

positive
At –20 kPa SMPT in moderately saline farmland, ASL significantly increased maize yield.
Modeling water−salt−nitrogen dynamics and crop growth of saline maize farmland in Northwest China: Searching for appropriate irrigation and N fertilization strategies · 2023 · compared with irrigation scenario without ASL
Opposite direction
positive
Maize crop yield significantly increased with water salinity.
Effect of wastewaters on plant growth and soil properties · 1993
Opposite direction
positive
Dual bacterial inoculation with 75% mineral N was a superior treatment for maize vegetative growth and grain yield.
Potential Impacts of Certain N2-Fixing Bacterial Strains and Mineral N Doses for Enhancing the Growth and Productivity of Maize Plants · 2023
Opposite direction
positive
Salt resistant hybrids showed no grain yield decrease under salinity.
Enhancing maize grain yield under salt‐affected field conditions using salt‐resistant maize hybrids and higher planting density · 2023
Opposite direction
positive
Cyclic saline irrigation produced satisfactory yields compared with blending when only one irrigation was needed.
Maize cultivars response to saline irrigation scheduling. · 2009 · compared with blending strategy
Opposite direction
positive
Yield reduction under salinity was 6.90%-9.12% in Wansheng 69, significantly lower than 16.12%-27.42% in Denghai 605.
Effects of salt stress on root growth and nutrient absorption efficiency of different salt-tolerant summer maize varieties · 2025 · compared with Denghai 605
Opposite direction
positive
Corn yield increases significantly with low irrigation water salinity combined with amendment addition
Effect of low and high irrigation water salinity on the soil moisture content distribution and corn crop productivity using · 2018
Opposite direction
positive
Reduction of the disease through salt application resulted in enhanced yield, especially at high concentrations.
Potential impacts of Copper Sulfate and Sodium Silicate Salts of Corn Late Wilt Disease in Field disease Nursery and Synthase of Anti-defense Compounds · 2020
Opposite direction

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction

positive
Saline irrigation benefited winter wheat yield versus no irrigation in all three years.
Effects of saline irrigation on soil salt accumulation and grain yield in the winter wheat-summer maize double cropping system in the low plain of North China · 2016 · compared with no irrigation (T1)
Opposite direction
positive
Grain yields of the main stem and tillers Tl and T2 under moderate salt stress were as great or greater than in nonstressed plants.
Contribution of Individual Culms to Yield of Salt‐Stressed Wheat · 1996 · compared with nonstressed plants
Opposite direction
positive
Salt-primed wheat had higher productivity than shock-only wheat.
Agronomical, physiological and molecular evaluation reveals superior salt-tolerance in bread wheat through salt-induced priming approach · 2021 · compared with non-pretreated (shock only)
Opposite direction
positive
Salinity decreased wheat yield and yield attributes.
Mitigation of salinity adverse effects of on wheat by grain priming with melatonin · 2016
Opposite direction
positive
Saline irrigation produced significantly higher wheat yield than non-saline irrigation.
Effect of amendments and saline irrigation water on soil properties and yields of rice and wheat in a highly sodic soil · 1994 · compared with non-saline water
Opposite direction
positive
BUMI8, Salt18 and BUMI1 showed no reduction in wheat grain yield under saline compared with normal conditions.
Evaluation of salt stress of Iranian wheat germplasm under field conditions · 2015 · compared with normal conditions
Opposite direction
positive
Spring wheat cultivar S-24 has superior grain yield potential in production fields with high levels of salinity.
Registration of ‘S‐24’ Spring Wheat with Improved Salt Tolerance · 2010
Opposite direction
positive
Increasing salinity decreased wheat grain yield.
Application of silicon ameliorated salinity stress and improved wheat yield · 2016
Opposite direction

218 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

positive
Grain yield was higher under sufficient water supply than under drought stress in all cultivars
Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat · 2017 · compared with drought stress
Opposite direction
positive
In field trials, Trichoderma koningii applied to the seed furrow increased spring wheat yield by 65% at Mt. Vernon, WA.
Combination ofTrichoderma koningiiwith Fluorescent Pseudomonads for Control of Take-all on Wheat · 1996
Opposite direction
positive
One third full irrigation significantly increased wheat yield.
Stabilizing Rainfed Wheat Yields with Supplemental Irrigation and Nitrogen in a Mediterranean Climate · 1998
Opposite direction
positive
Doubling irrigated land by 2035 with crop intensification could increase wheat production and make Egypt self-sufficient in the near future.
Can Egypt become self-sufficient in wheat? · 2018
Opposite direction
positive
irrigation at jointing and at jointing plus anthesis improved grain yield by an average of 12.79 and 18.65% across three cropping seasons, respectively, compared with no irrigation
Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application on grain amino acid composition and protein quality in winter wheat · 2017 · compared with no irrigation
Opposite direction
positive
Each additional 60 mm irrigation increased simulated crop yield by 1.2 t ha −1.
Modeling Wheat and Maize Productivity as Affected by Climate Variation and Irrigation Supply in North China Plain · 2010
Opposite direction
positive
Frequent small irrigations significantly improved biomass yield.
Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Use in Simulation of Irrigated Winter Wheat Canopy Cover, Biomass, and Grain Yield in the North China Plain · 2014
Opposite direction
positive
Extra irrigation increased wheat yield in Sudan and Mexico.
Wheat Management in Warm Environments: Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers, Irrigation Frequency, and Mulching · 1999
Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

salinity · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results