Carludovica palmata 40 claims

Claim · model-written summary

A complete genome sequence of Carludovica palmata Ruiz & Pavón is presented.

Taxon

Carludovica palmata Ruiz & PavónCarludovica palmatae0

Outcome

complete genome sequencese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“complete genome sequences of Carludovica palmata Ruiz & Pavón and C. drudei Mast.”

Claim · model-written summary

A 12 h frequency and 1 min immersion improved shoot and root length, leaf number, and dry weight.

Taxon

Carludovica palmataCarludovica palmatat0

Treatment

a frequency of 12 h with an immersion time of 1 mine0

Outcome

length of shoots, roots, and number of leaves, and dry weighte0

Direction

improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained show a frequency of 12 h with an immersion time of 1 min improved the length of shoots, roots, and number of leaves, and dry weight.”

t0

“Carludovica palmata Ruiz y Pav”

Claim · model-written summary

A volume of 20 mL/explant increased shoot number and length, leaf number, and dry weight.

Taxon

Carludovica palmataCarludovica palmatat0

Treatment

20 mL/explante0

Outcome

number and length of shoots, the number of leaves, and the dry weighte0

Direction

increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A volume of 20 mL/explant was found to be an adequate condition to increase the number and length of shoots, the number of leaves, and the dry weight.”

t0

“Carludovica palmata Ruiz y Pav”

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized conditions maximize evaluated propagation variables.

Taxon

Carludovica palmataCarludovica palmatat0

Treatment

a 1-minute immersion of the tissues in the culture medium with a frequency of 12 hours each time, with 175 mL of culture medium per bioreactor and density of 10 explantse0

Outcome

evaluated variablese0

Direction

maximizee0

Value

175 mLe0

Verbatim

e0

“the factor levels that will maximize the evaluated variables are a 1-minute immersion of the tissues in the culture medium with a frequency of 12 hours each time, with 175 mL of culture medium per bioreactor and density of 10 explants”

t0

“Carludovica palmata Ruiz y Pav”

Claim · model-written summary

TIB was efficient for massive micropropagation compared with conventional methods.

Taxon

C. palmataCarludovica palmatae0

Outcome

massive micropropagatione0

Direction

efficiente0

Comparator

conventional methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“TIB was shown to be efficient for massive micropropagation of C. palmata compared with conventional methods.”

Claim · model-written summary

BAP at 2.0 mg L-1 gave the highest multiplication rate, 17±3 shoots per explant.

Taxon

Carludovica palmataCarludovica palmatat0

Treatment

2.0 mg L-1 of BAPe0

Outcome

multiplication ratee0

Direction

higheste0

Value

17±3 shoots per explante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest multiplication rate (17±3 shoots per explant) was obtained with 2.0 mg L-1 of BAP.”

t0

“Carludovica palmata”

Claim · model-written summary

Root formation was efficient in all treatments, with no significant differences between treatments.

Taxon

Carludovica palmataCarludovica palmatat0

Treatment

all treatmentse0

Outcome

Root formatione0

Qualifier

without significant statistical differencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Root formation occurred efficiently in all treatments, without significant statistical differences between them.”

t0

“Carludovica palmata”

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-t15 was the best substrate treatment for greenhouse growth of C. palmata.

Taxon

C. palmataCarludovica palmatae0

Treatment

substrate soil-t15e0

Outcome

growthe0

Direction

beste0

Setting

greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, the use of substrate soil-t15 was the best treatment for the growth of C. palmata under greenhouse conditions.”

Claim · model-written summary

C. palmata can be efficiently multiplied in vitro and had no problems during in vivo rooting.

Taxon

C. palmataCarludovica palmatae0

Outcome

efficiently multiplied under in vitro conditions and did not present problems during the in vivo rooting processe0

Verbatim

e0

“From the results obtained, it is concluded that C. palmata can be efficiently multiplied under in vitro conditions and did not present problems during the in vivo rooting process.”

Claim · model-written summary

AMF root colonization exceeded 56% in all examined plant species.

Taxon

Carludovica palmata, Costus scaber and Euterpe precatoriaCarludovica palmataEuterpe precatoriaCostus scabert0

Interactor

AMFe0symbiont

Outcome

AMF root colonizatione0

Direction

exceedede0

Value

56%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Carludovica palmata, Costus scaber and Euterpe precatoria”

e0

“AMF root colonization exceeded 56% in all plant species examined and no significant difference was observed between sites or plants.”