By organism › Green plants › Anacardiaceae › Rhus typhina

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated diversity positively affected R. typhina growth and biomass allocation.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: simulated diversitye0
Outcome: Aboveground plant growth and biomass allocation differed significantly between the two invasive plants under simulated diversity, with negative effects on P. americana and positive effects on R. typhina.e0
Direction: positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Aboveground plant growth and biomass allocation differed significantly between the two invasive plants under simulated diversity, with negative effects on P. americana and positive effects on R. typhina.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–885

Title

Soil fungal influence on the diversity–invasibility relationship depends on interacting species identities

Yanhui Zhuge; Haokun Li; Yunhao Meng; et al. Ecological Applications 2026. doi:10.1002/eap.70186

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Simulated diversity negatively affected P. americana growth and biomass allocation.
Intervention effect Soil microorganisms inhibited P. americana growth.
Intervention effect Soil microorganisms promoted R. typhina growth.
Observation R. typhina enhanced stress tolerance through association with soil fungi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microorganisms promoted R. typhina growth.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: soil microorganismse0
Interactor: soil microorganismse0other
Outcome: Both the diversity effects and soil inoculation experiments showed that the growth of P. americana was inhibited, while that of R. typhina was promoted by soil microorganisms.e0
Direction: promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Both the diversity effects and soil inoculation experiments showed that the growth of P. americana was inhibited, while that of R. typhina was promoted by soil microorganisms.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1061

Title

Soil fungal influence on the diversity–invasibility relationship depends on interacting species identities

Yanhui Zhuge; Haokun Li; Yunhao Meng; et al. Ecological Applications 2026. doi:10.1002/eap.70186

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Simulated diversity negatively affected P. americana growth and biomass allocation.
Intervention effect Simulated diversity positively affected R. typhina growth and biomass allocation.
Intervention effect Soil microorganisms inhibited P. americana growth.
Observation R. typhina enhanced stress tolerance through association with soil fungi.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. typhina enhanced stress tolerance through association with soil fungi.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Interactor: soil fungie0symbiont
Outcome: the arbuscular mycorrhizal plant R. typhina enhanced its stress tolerance through close associations with soil fungi.e0

Verbatim

e0
“the arbuscular mycorrhizal plant R. typhina enhanced its stress tolerance through close associations with soil fungi.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1228

Title

Soil fungal influence on the diversity–invasibility relationship depends on interacting species identities

Yanhui Zhuge; Haokun Li; Yunhao Meng; et al. Ecological Applications 2026. doi:10.1002/eap.70186

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Simulated diversity negatively affected P. americana growth and biomass allocation.
Intervention effect Simulated diversity positively affected R. typhina growth and biomass allocation.
Intervention effect Soil microorganisms inhibited P. americana growth.
Intervention effect Soil microorganisms promoted R. typhina growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Invasive R. typhina biomass increased with the nitrogen-fixing legume versus conspecific neighbors.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: nitrogen-fixing legumee0
Outcome: total biomasse0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: conspecific neighborse0

Verbatim

e0
“The total biomass of invasive R. typhina increased when grown with the nitrogen-fixing legume compared with conspecific neighbors, but not when grown with the non-nitrogen-fixing legume.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1065

Title

Turncoat? Native Nitrogen‐Fixing Legumes Facilitate Plant Invasion via Soil Microbes and Nitrogen Transfer

Zhenwei Xu; Warwick J. Allen; Linwei Wu; et al. Global Change Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/gcb.70847

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect The non-nitrogen-fixing legume did not increase R. typhina biomass versus conspecifics.
Intervention effect Blocking nitrogen transfer suppressed the legume benefit to R. typhina.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina growth.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina interactions with legumes.
Intervention effect R. chinensis biomass did not differ among neighboring plant treatments.
Association Global meta-analysis found native legumes enhanced invasive plant performance.
Mechanism Authors inferred nitrogen-fixing legumes facilitate invasion via nutrient and microbial pathways.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-nitrogen-fixing legume did not increase R. typhina biomass versus conspecifics.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: non-nitrogen-fixing legumee0
Outcome: total biomasse0
Direction: but note0
Comparator: conspecific neighborse0

Verbatim

e0
“The total biomass of invasive R. typhina increased when grown with the nitrogen-fixing legume compared with conspecific neighbors, but not when grown with the non-nitrogen-fixing legume.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1065

Title

Turncoat? Native Nitrogen‐Fixing Legumes Facilitate Plant Invasion via Soil Microbes and Nitrogen Transfer

Zhenwei Xu; Warwick J. Allen; Linwei Wu; et al. Global Change Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/gcb.70847

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Invasive R. typhina biomass increased with the nitrogen-fixing legume versus conspecific neighbors.
Intervention effect Blocking nitrogen transfer suppressed the legume benefit to R. typhina.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina growth.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina interactions with legumes.
Intervention effect R. chinensis biomass did not differ among neighboring plant treatments.
Association Global meta-analysis found native legumes enhanced invasive plant performance.
Mechanism Authors inferred nitrogen-fixing legumes facilitate invasion via nutrient and microbial pathways.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blocking nitrogen transfer suppressed the legume benefit to R. typhina.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: nitrogen transfer or soil microbial movement was obstructed by membranese0
Outcome: Positive effects of the nitrogen-fixing legumee0
Direction: suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Positive effects of the nitrogen-fixing legume on R. typhina were suppressed when nitrogen transfer or soil microbial movement was obstructed by membranes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1221

Title

Turncoat? Native Nitrogen‐Fixing Legumes Facilitate Plant Invasion via Soil Microbes and Nitrogen Transfer

Zhenwei Xu; Warwick J. Allen; Linwei Wu; et al. Global Change Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/gcb.70847

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Invasive R. typhina biomass increased with the nitrogen-fixing legume versus conspecific neighbors.
Intervention effect The non-nitrogen-fixing legume did not increase R. typhina biomass versus conspecifics.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina growth.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina interactions with legumes.
Intervention effect R. chinensis biomass did not differ among neighboring plant treatments.
Association Global meta-analysis found native legumes enhanced invasive plant performance.
Mechanism Authors inferred nitrogen-fixing legumes facilitate invasion via nutrient and microbial pathways.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina growth.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: Exogenous nitrogen additione0
Outcome: growth of invasive R. typhinae0
Direction: did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Exogenous nitrogen addition did not alter the growth of invasive R. typhina or its interactions with legumes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1331

Title

Turncoat? Native Nitrogen‐Fixing Legumes Facilitate Plant Invasion via Soil Microbes and Nitrogen Transfer

Zhenwei Xu; Warwick J. Allen; Linwei Wu; et al. Global Change Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/gcb.70847

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Invasive R. typhina biomass increased with the nitrogen-fixing legume versus conspecific neighbors.
Intervention effect The non-nitrogen-fixing legume did not increase R. typhina biomass versus conspecifics.
Intervention effect Blocking nitrogen transfer suppressed the legume benefit to R. typhina.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina interactions with legumes.
Intervention effect R. chinensis biomass did not differ among neighboring plant treatments.
Association Global meta-analysis found native legumes enhanced invasive plant performance.
Mechanism Authors inferred nitrogen-fixing legumes facilitate invasion via nutrient and microbial pathways.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina interactions with legumes.

Taxon: R. typhinaRhus typhinae0
Treatment: Exogenous nitrogen additione0
Outcome: interactions with legumese0
Direction: did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Exogenous nitrogen addition did not alter the growth of invasive R. typhina or its interactions with legumes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1331

Title

Turncoat? Native Nitrogen‐Fixing Legumes Facilitate Plant Invasion via Soil Microbes and Nitrogen Transfer

Zhenwei Xu; Warwick J. Allen; Linwei Wu; et al. Global Change Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/gcb.70847

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Invasive R. typhina biomass increased with the nitrogen-fixing legume versus conspecific neighbors.
Intervention effect The non-nitrogen-fixing legume did not increase R. typhina biomass versus conspecifics.
Intervention effect Blocking nitrogen transfer suppressed the legume benefit to R. typhina.
Intervention effect Added nitrogen did not alter invasive R. typhina growth.
Intervention effect R. chinensis biomass did not differ among neighboring plant treatments.
Association Global meta-analysis found native legumes enhanced invasive plant performance.
Mechanism Authors inferred nitrogen-fixing legumes facilitate invasion via nutrient and microbial pathways.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhus typhina L. had a positive total oxidant capacity of 122.56 ± 7.85 µM H₂O₂ Equiv./L.

Taxon: Rhus typhina L.Rhus typhinae5
Outcome: total oxidant capacitye5
Value: 122.56 ± 7.85 µM H₂O₂ Equiv./Le5

Verbatim

e5
“Rhus typhina L. and Impatiens balfourii Hooker f., exhibited positive total oxidant capacity values of 122.56 ± 7.85 µM H₂O₂ Equiv./L and 141.38 ± 4.33 µM H₂O₂ Equiv./L, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–948

Title

Antioxidant Properties of Alien Plant Species: Assessing Phenolic and Flavonoid Content, Antioxidant, Oxidant Capacities, and Antimicrobial Activity

Glasnik hemicara i tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine 2025. doi:10.35666/2232-7266.2025.64.04

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhus typhina L. showed the highest total antioxidant capacity, 1190,06 ± 137,36 CEAC µM.

Taxon: Rhus typhina LRhus typhinae6
Outcome: total antioxidant capacitye6
Direction: higheste6
Value: 1190,06 ± 137,36 CEAC µMe6

Verbatim

e6
“These two species also showed the highest total antioxidant capacity that were 1190,06 ± 137,36 CEAC µM for Rhus typhina L and 1540,34 ± 270,84 for CEAC Impatiens balfourii Hooker f.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1132

Title

Antioxidant Properties of Alien Plant Species: Assessing Phenolic and Flavonoid Content, Antioxidant, Oxidant Capacities, and Antimicrobial Activity

Glasnik hemicara i tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine 2025. doi:10.35666/2232-7266.2025.64.04

Other claims from this paper (12)

Rhus typhina 516 claims

516 claims